Blatchford wrote that Layton's letter was "vainglorious," full of "sophistry," and that "It's remarkable because it shows what a canny, relentless, thoroughly ambitious fellow Mr. Layton was. Even on Saturday, two days before he died, he managed to keep a gimlet eye on all the campaigns to come."
Blatchford has been ridiculing Layton since her Toronto Sun days, when he was a pioneering, pro-gay, pro-bike, jovial and progressive city councillor. I wouldn't be surprised how much Layton's rise has burned the right, and specifically people like Blatchford, who used to constantly belittle him. Layton's star rose far beyond anything they've ever had to contribute, or could contribute, to our civic life.
The bitterness Blatchford has revealed is deeply held. It is nothing more than the rage of a frustrated hack, who prognosticated nothing but humiliation and failure for Layton. So, having missed the mark so widely, what does she do? She does what she does best: reveal her true nature once more, with a nasty piece of vitriol which only illustrates how miserable she is, and always has been. Meanwhile in complete contrast, Layton displayed nothing but a complete generous, positive and compassionate goodness throughout his selfless existence and struggle for social justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.