Ludicrous U.K. election results

Another first-past-the-post election, another train wreck for democracy. The British Liberal Democrats won 23% of the votes but only 8% of the seats in Parliamen. The Conservatives won 36% of the vote, but will have 47% of the seats; Labour won 29% of the votes, but will receive 40% of the seats. Nick Clegg, the Leader of the Liberal-Democrats, better not sell out proportional representation and form a coalition government with aristocratic snob David Cameron, the Leader of the Conservative Party. The Conservatives have zero interest in electoral reform and would like nothing more than to sweep in another era of disastrous Thatcherism. This is such a great opportunity for both Great Britain and Canada to end this disgusting, anti-democratic system. Don't sell out Clegg!

From Fair Vote Canada:

Ludicrous election results in U.K. match those in Canada

May 7, 2010

But unlike Canada, Britain may move on electoral reform

Yesterday’s British parliamentary election provided yet another breath-taking example of how an antiquated winner-take-all voting system distorts election results.

With 626 of the 650 seats declared (8am, May 7), the Conservatives won about 47% of the seats with just 36% of the votes. Labour received an equivalent windfall of undeserved seats: 40% of the seats with just 29% of the votes.

Meanwhile, the Liberal Democrats won only 8% of the seats, despite winning about 23% of the votes. As Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said, it is “abundantly clear the electoral system is broken.”

“As ludicrous as Britain’s election results are, they are no worse than what we experience in Canada,” said Bronwen Bruch, President of Fair Vote Canada, a multi-partisan citizens’ campaign for voting system reform in Canada. "The big difference is that Britain may well move forward on electoral reform, since both Labour and the Liberal Democrats, who together represent a majority of voters, are prepared to scrap the discredited first-past-the-post system. The Liberal Democrats are expected to demand action on proportional representation.”

Yesterday’s election in the U.K. follows the 2005 election in which Tony Blair’s Labour Party won a majority of seats with a mere 35% of the popular vote.
How bad are Canadian elections in comparison?

“In recent years we have had three provincial majority governments formed by parties that came in second place in the popular vote,” said Larry Gordon, Executive Director of Fair Vote Canada. “The current Liberal government in New Brunswick is an example – the New Brunswick Conservatives actually won more votes in the last election.”

Fair Vote Canada also pointed to these examples of electoral dysfunction in Canada:

- In 1997, Jean Chretien’s Liberals won a majority of seats with just 39% of the votes.

- In 1990, Bob Rae’s New Democrats won a majority in Ontario with less than 38% of the votes.

- In the 2008 federal election, 940,000 Greens elected no one, while 813,000 Conservative voters in Alberta alone sent 27 MPs to Parliament.

“Pressure for electoral reform has been slowly building in Britain and then the MPs’ spending scandal blew the lid,” said Gordon. “Plus, Nick Clegg, the third party leader has said electoral reform is a condition for supporting a new government. A similar mix of conditions may be building in Canada – we can only hope since Canadian voter turnout is dropping as people walk away in disgust from our dysfunctional system.”